« December 2011 | Main | February 2012 »
Posted at 05:46 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Remember the old Penn Central Railroad? Many of us may like to forget that. It was formed by the merger of two of the greatest railroads in US history: the New York Central Railroad and the Pennsylvania Railroad on February 1, 1968.
Changing times along with government regulation and union contracts that did not change with the times were forcing these two once great railroads to seek drastic solutions to their economic problems.
The New Haven Railroad (New York, New Haven, and Hartford) was included in the merger at ICC insistence on January 1, 1969. However the merger did not allow for cost saving reductions as had been hoped and in only two short years on June 21, 1970 the Penn Central filed for bankruptcy.
After operating under bankruptcy reorganization for almost 6 years, Penn Central finally ended on April 1, 1976, when the Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act took affect, nationalizing Penn Central and five smaller northeast railroads into the Consolidated Rail Corp (Conrail).
One of the somewhat humorous things that came out of the formation of Penn Central was the insignia of the Penn Central. It actually was a clever emblem, but railroad buffs called it “two worms in love.” I have included a picture of a GG1 electric locomotive with this symbol clearly visible. Enjoy.
--Dale
Posted at 09:47 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Golden Spike Tower at Bailey Yard
North Platte, NE, is the location of the largest railroad yard in the world: Union Pacific’s Bailey Yard. In order to take advantage of railroad fans’ interest in this, Union Pacific has erected the Golden Spike Tower, an eight story observation deck overlooking the yard which, for a fee, allows guests to look over this huge railroad yard and watch the activity going on there.
Union Pacific also supplies a railroad man who can answer most of your questions regarding Bailey Yard, Union Pacific Railroad, and the people and equipment there.
The fee that I paid to get in the tower was $7.00. After I paid the fee I took the elevator to the eighth floor viewing deck.
The closest part of the yard is the locomotive servicing facilities to the west of the tower. Scanning on around toward the north one sees the eastbound hump yard at some distance, followed by the west bound hump yard at a closer distance as we scan directly to the north.
The eighth floor is completely glassed in, but an open deck is provided on the seventh floor for cameras with automatic focus which would be fooled by the glass. There are also displays on the ground floor as well as the eighth floor which would be of interest to railroad buffs.
The Golden Spike Tower is not on a main thoroughfare. From I-80 or coming from the north, south, or east, take US 83 into North Platte and turn west on the road just south of the railroad bridge. You will need to follow this four or five miles along the southern perimeter of the yard.
You will have no problem identifying the tower when you get out there. Coming from the west on US 30, turn south on a rather obscure country road that takes off between two corn fields about four miles east of Hershey. This is the last road that crosses the tracks going into Bailey Yard from the west.
Bear left after crossing the tracks along the perimeter of the yard. Again you will have no trouble identifying the Golden Spike Tower as you approach. It is worth the trouble to find it and climb it.
Your main problem will be finding an opportunity to talk to the UP trainman in the tower as he will be busy with a lot of people. But if you get that opportunity, you will be able to have a most enjoyable conversation with him regarding Bailey Yard in particular and railroad things in general.
--Dale
Posted at 04:53 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Maybe you’ve been asking, “What size rail should I use for the track on my HO gauge layout?” Code 100 and code 83 are the sizes most readily available in HO gauge. Code 70 is a smaller size which is also readily available but not so common. In N gauge, code 55 would correspond to code 100 in HO gauge.
First let me give a little background information: The code number gives the actual height of the rail in thousandths of an inch. Code 100 is correspondingly 0.100 of an inch high, code 83 is 0.083 inch high, code 70 is 0.070 inch high, and code 55 is 0.055 inch high. This is actual inches, not scale inches.
How then does this correspond with prototypical rail? Code 100 would correspond to rail that weighs 156 lbs. per yard. That is very heavy rail, and prototypically was used only by the Pennsylvania Railroad and then only for a short period of time in western Pennsylvania where they ran heavy coal trains. Model railroaders complain about code 100 rail looking too large to look real with some justification.
Code 83 rail corresponds to prototypical rail weighing 132 lbs. per yard. That is very common on mainline and even on branch lines today. In the last two years they put down 136 lb. welded rail on the Dakota, Minnesota, and Eastern Railroad (aka Canadian Pacific now) through my home town of Dodge Center, MN, and 132 lb. welded rail in Claremont, MN, the next town to the west. It replaced very old (1920’s) jointed rail that was only 90 lbs. in weight. In contrast to today, 132 lb. rail was used only on the busiest mainlines in the 1950s. What size model rail you choose may depend somewhat on the era you want to model.
Code 70 rail would correspond to 100 lb. prototypical rail, and code 55 in HO gauge to 75 lb. prototypical rail. 100 lb. rail was commonly used on mainlines around World War I, while 75 lb. rail was used in the 1800s.
There are other factors besides realism that may affect you choice of track rail. Will the flanges of your rolling stock run on the smaller rail without derailing? Particularly if you have plastic wheels, this will be an issue. Model railroaders I know would encourage the use of metal wheels for this reason and for other reasons, such as greater ease in keeping the track clean.
Other factors may include cost. Code 100 generally is the least expensive with the most product options, though code 83 is close behind. Code 100 is also more rugged. The model railroad club I belong chose code 100 for their layout because it would hold up better when it became necessary to climb onto the layout for construction purposes or for operational problems that may occur in the “back 40.” I use code 100 on my layout simply because I had a heavy investment in that size track when I began. I am also finding out that spikes, ballast, and debris along the track is less of a problem due to the greater height on the larger size rail. My model railroading friend in town uses code 83. The cost to him was only slightly higher and the track he obtained had more realistically sized and colored ties in addition to the more realistically sized rails.
Posted at 06:48 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)